ADVERTISEABOUT USSUBMIT A STORYSUBSCRIBETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY
Visit our family of Brands

guest column

Expert shares tips on ways to make solar panels more accessible to Houstonians

Robert Angell
Oct 10, 2024, 8:33 am
Badge
Guest Column
Houstonians, here's how to get solar panels affordably. Photo by Kindel Media/Pexels

There’s no question that some homeowners feel a twinge of envy when they see solar panels appearing on homes in their neighborhood. The twin benefits of cutting utility costs and participating in renewable energy are alluring to many.

But as those homeowners consider going solar, many never take the plunge because of concerns about affordability, maintenance and uncertainties around qualifying for tax credits and other state and local rebates. For all its appeal, going solar can seem a bit daunting.

But there are more plentiful financing options available to many Texas homeowners that offer accommodating paths for acquiring solar. They also provide solutions to concerns around maintenance and affordability.

Two innovative strategies for switching to solar

Solar energy providers have been working diligently to deliver more convenient pathways for consumers to make the switch. Recently, two new strategies were introduced in Texas: direct, loan-based ownership, and third-party ownership.

Direct system ownership

With this option, homeowners take out a loan to cover the cost of their solar system and its installation. They can then repay that loan over timeframes ranging from five to twenty-five years.

There are varying rates and terms available to accommodate the preferences and goals of individual homeowners. And while manufacturer warranties and installer workmanship warranties have been available to homeowners, it is important to look for companies that offer guarantees for an extended period of time given that most systems can last several decades. For example, Freedom Forever offers a 25-year production guarantee that provides consumers with a measure of comfort around the long-term costs of owning these systems.

Third-party ownership

Another solar financing option involves third-party ownership using a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) or lease. With a PPA option, a third-party owns the system, and homeowners either agree to buy power at a pre-defined rate per kWh or through a set monthly payment. Homeowners also have the option of leasing the panels for comparable pre-defined rates or monthly payments. (Maybe add one more sentence that explains the difference between PPAs vs lease).

With these two options, the third party insures and maintains the system. This alleviates some of the maintenance and up front cost concerns that have held some back from solar.

Issues to consider before making the switch

Even with the availability of these new options, solar power doesn’t always make sense for everyone. Your personal energy goals and preferences, as well as your tax situation, are important factors to consider when making this decision. Here are some questions folks should ask before making the switch:

  • Would I prefer owning the system outright or relying on a third-party to handle insurance and maintenance?
  • Am I looking for monthly savings now through a PPA or lease or would I prefer the quickest payback and return on investment?
  • Do I have a tax liability that enables me to get a Federal Tax Credit?

The answers to these questions will help you determine which option, if any, makes sense for you. It’s important to remember there is no “best solution for everyone” when considering your options; there’s only the question of what’s right for you.

Other important considerations

Keep in mind that not everyone will qualify for one of the solar options described above. Even in these cases, your state, local utility or a regional credit union may offer alternative financing options that can help you access solar.

Home equity lines of credit may also be a fitting option for some. Dsireusa.org is an excellent resource to help you investigate what incentives and programs are available in your area.

Final tips

As with any important financial decision, it’s a homeowner’s’ responsibility to practice due diligence in terms of assessing what they can afford and who they buy from. Here are some recommended best practices:

  1. Always get several quotes from various companies.
  2. Ask about production guarantees and warranties.
  3. Ask about the need of a service panel upgrade at the start.
  4. Verify that the company you choose offers products that will work with your home construction and roof.
  5. Prioritize solar providers with an extensive list of authorized dealers, such as Freedom Forever.
  6. Confirm that your prospective solar partner has purchasing options around loans and financing and can help you identify the option that best suits your needs.

The good news is that more homeowners than ever before can now feel more comfortable moving to solar. The new options described above for financing and maintenance can make that switch considerably less daunting than it seemed only a few years ago.

———

Robert Angell is the vice president of sales operations at Freedom Forever, one the nation’s largest solar installers.

From Your Site Articles
renewable energysolar panelspower purchase agreementrobert angellguest columnfreedom forever

Trending News

A View From HETI

the view from heti

25 years of innovation: Repsol exec on Houston's role in the energy transition

the view from heti

Event spotlights Houston's collaborative approach, innovation driving global energy transition

the view from heti

Highlights from the inaugural Houston Energy and Climate Startup Week

hard no

Judge once again rejects Texas-based Tesla's multi-billion-dollar pay package for Elon Musk — now what?

Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder who sued to block the pay package contended that shareholders who had voted for the 10-year plan in 2018 had been given misleading and incomplete information. Photo via cdn.britannica.com

For a second time, a Delaware judge has nullified a pay package that Tesla had awarded its CEO, Elon Musk, that once was valued at $56 billion.

Last week, Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick turned aside a request from Musk's lawyers to reverse a ruling she announced in January that had thrown out the compensation plan. The judge ruled then that Musk effectively controlled Tesla's board and had engineered the outsize pay package during sham negotiations.

Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder who sued to block the pay package contended that shareholders who had voted for the 10-year plan in 2018 had been given misleading and incomplete information.

In their defense, Tesla's board members asserted that the shareholders who ratified the pay plan a second time in June had done so after receiving full disclosures, thereby curing all the problems the judge had cited in her January ruling. As a result, they argued, Musk deserved the pay package for having raised Tesla's market value by billions of dollars.

McCormick rejected that argument. In her 103-page opinion, she ruled that under Delaware law, Tesla's lawyers had no grounds to reverse her January ruling “based on evidence they created after trial.”

What will Musk and Tesla do now?

On Monday night, Tesla posted on X, the social media platform owned by Musk, that the company will appeal. The appeal would be filed with the Delaware Supreme Court, the only state appellate court Tesla can pursue. Experts say a ruling would likely come in less than a year.

“The ruling, if not overturned, means that judges and plaintiffs' lawyers run Delaware companies rather than their rightful owners — the shareholders,” Tesla argued.

Later, on X, Musk unleashed a blistering attack on the judge, asserting that McCormick is “a radical far left activist cosplaying as a judge.”

What do experts say about the case?

Legal authorities generally suggest that McCormick’s ruling was sound and followed the law. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, said that in his view, McCormick was right to rule that after Tesla lost its case in the original trial, it created improper new evidence by asking shareholders to ratify the pay package a second time.

Had she allowed such a claim, he said, it would cause a major shift in Delaware’s laws against conflicts of interest given the unusually close relationship between Musk and Tesla’s board.

“Delaware protects investors — that’s what she did,” said Elson, who has followed the court for more than three decades. “Just because you’re a ‘superstar CEO’ doesn’t put you in a separate category.”

Elson said he thinks investors would be reluctant to put money into Delaware companies if there were exceptions to the law for “special people.”

What will the Delaware Supreme Court do?

Elson said that in his opinion, the court is likely to uphold McCormick's ruling.

Can Tesla appeal to federal courts?

Experts say no. Rulings on state laws are normally left to state courts. Brian Dunn, program director for the Institute of Compensation Studies at Cornell University, said it's been his experience that Tesla has no choice but to stay in the Delaware courts for this compensation package.

Tesla has moved its legal headquarters to Texas. Does that matter?

The company could try to reconstitute the pay package and seek approval in Texas, where it may expect more friendlier judges. But Dunn, who has spent 40 years as an executive compensation consultant, said it's likely that some other shareholder would challenge the award in Texas because it's excessive compared with other CEOs' pay plans.

“If they just want to turn around and deliver him $56 billion, I can't believe somebody wouldn't want to litigate it,” Dunn said. “It's an unconscionable amount of money.”

Would a new pay package be even larger?

Almost certainly. Tesla stock is trading at 15 times the exercise price of stock options in the current package in Delaware, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to investors. Tesla's share price has doubled in the past six months, Jonas wrote. At Monday’s closing stock price, the Musk package is now worth $101.4 billion, according to Equilar, an executive data firm.

And Musk has asked for a subsequent pay package that would give him 25 percent of Tesla's voting shares. Musk has said he is uncomfortable moving further into artificial intelligence with the company if he doesn't have 25 percent control. He currently holds about 13 percent of Tesla's outstanding shares.

elon muskpay packageshareholdersdelaware judgeteslachancellor kathaleen st. jude mccormick

Trending News