ADVERTISEABOUT USSUBMIT A STORYSUBSCRIBETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY
Visit our family of Brands

Expert shares tips on ways to make solar panels more accessible to Houstonians

guest column

Houstonians, here's how to get solar panels affordably. Photo by Kindel Media/Pexels

There’s no question that some homeowners feel a twinge of envy when they see solar panels appearing on homes in their neighborhood. The twin benefits of cutting utility costs and participating in renewable energy are alluring to many.

But as those homeowners consider going solar, many never take the plunge because of concerns about affordability, maintenance and uncertainties around qualifying for tax credits and other state and local rebates. For all its appeal, going solar can seem a bit daunting.

But there are more plentiful financing options available to many Texas homeowners that offer accommodating paths for acquiring solar. They also provide solutions to concerns around maintenance and affordability.

Two innovative strategies for switching to solar

Solar energy providers have been working diligently to deliver more convenient pathways for consumers to make the switch. Recently, two new strategies were introduced in Texas: direct, loan-based ownership, and third-party ownership.

Direct system ownership

With this option, homeowners take out a loan to cover the cost of their solar system and its installation. They can then repay that loan over timeframes ranging from five to twenty-five years.

There are varying rates and terms available to accommodate the preferences and goals of individual homeowners. And while manufacturer warranties and installer workmanship warranties have been available to homeowners, it is important to look for companies that offer guarantees for an extended period of time given that most systems can last several decades. For example, Freedom Forever offers a 25-year production guarantee that provides consumers with a measure of comfort around the long-term costs of owning these systems.

Third-party ownership

Another solar financing option involves third-party ownership using a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) or lease. With a PPA option, a third-party owns the system, and homeowners either agree to buy power at a pre-defined rate per kWh or through a set monthly payment. Homeowners also have the option of leasing the panels for comparable pre-defined rates or monthly payments. (Maybe add one more sentence that explains the difference between PPAs vs lease).

With these two options, the third party insures and maintains the system. This alleviates some of the maintenance and up front cost concerns that have held some back from solar.

Issues to consider before making the switch

Even with the availability of these new options, solar power doesn’t always make sense for everyone. Your personal energy goals and preferences, as well as your tax situation, are important factors to consider when making this decision. Here are some questions folks should ask before making the switch:

  • Would I prefer owning the system outright or relying on a third-party to handle insurance and maintenance?
  • Am I looking for monthly savings now through a PPA or lease or would I prefer the quickest payback and return on investment?
  • Do I have a tax liability that enables me to get a Federal Tax Credit?

The answers to these questions will help you determine which option, if any, makes sense for you. It’s important to remember there is no “best solution for everyone” when considering your options; there’s only the question of what’s right for you.

Other important considerations

Keep in mind that not everyone will qualify for one of the solar options described above. Even in these cases, your state, local utility or a regional credit union may offer alternative financing options that can help you access solar.

Home equity lines of credit may also be a fitting option for some. Dsireusa.org is an excellent resource to help you investigate what incentives and programs are available in your area.

Final tips

As with any important financial decision, it’s a homeowner’s’ responsibility to practice due diligence in terms of assessing what they can afford and who they buy from. Here are some recommended best practices:

  1. Always get several quotes from various companies.
  2. Ask about production guarantees and warranties.
  3. Ask about the need of a service panel upgrade at the start.
  4. Verify that the company you choose offers products that will work with your home construction and roof.
  5. Prioritize solar providers with an extensive list of authorized dealers, such as Freedom Forever.
  6. Confirm that your prospective solar partner has purchasing options around loans and financing and can help you identify the option that best suits your needs.

The good news is that more homeowners than ever before can now feel more comfortable moving to solar. The new options described above for financing and maintenance can make that switch considerably less daunting than it seemed only a few years ago.

———

Robert Angell is the vice president of sales operations at Freedom Forever, one the nation’s largest solar installers.

From Your Site Articles
Ad Placement 300x100
Ad Placement 300x600

CultureMap Emails are Awesome

Property Showcase

Telsa eyes Houston area for $10 billion solar manufacturing plant

under review

Electric vehicle and clean energy company Tesla is considering building a new $10.1 billion solar cell manufacturing facility in Fort Bend County, according to documents filed with the Texas Comptroller’s Office.

If approved, the plant, called Project Sun City, would be located on a 3,050-acre site off FM 762 and FM 1994 in Richmond, Texas. Tesla aims to finish construction in 2028, with the plant being operational by early 2029.

The plant will manufacture photovoltaic (PV) solar cells and modules that can convert sunlight into electricity. PV Magazine reports that the facility is "the largest single manufacturing investment Tesla has proposed on paper."

Advisory and consulting firm Kroll submitted the documents to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and noted if an agreement regarding tax incentives isn't reached, the project will exit Texas.

Tesla has requested credits under the Jobs, Energy, Technology, and Innovation (JETI) Act. The incentive program aims to attract large, capital-intensive economic development projects by lowering the property taxes an entity must pay over 10 years if it meets requirements related to job creation and investment. For example, pharmaceutical giant Bristol Myers Squibb Co. recently announced that its forthcoming $2.3 billion Houston-area manufacturing site is a qualified project under the JETI program.

Kroll predicts that the facility would create 9,712 new full-time jobs, over 1,100 construction jobs and billions of dollars in future property tax revenue, the documents show. Additionally, it says the project will spur $1.1 billion in local business expenditures and that Texas would increase its GDP by approximately $107 billion as a result of the project activities.

Tesla opened its $200 million Megafactory in Brookshire, Texas, last year. The company is continuing its goal to deploy 100 gigawatts of solar manufacturing in the U.S before the end of 2028. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, 100 gigawatts is equal to about 8 percent of the country's power grid capacity.

Houston researchers land $10M grant to study how climate change drives disease threats

climate health research

Researchers from Rice University, Baylor College of Medicine and the University of Texas School of Public Health have received a $10 million grant to support research and public education on how climate change is linked to public health.

The funding comes from North Carolina-based Burroughs Wellcome Fund and is known as the organization’s Climate + Health Excellence (CHEX) award. It will be used over the next five years to launch the new FORECAST initiative, led by Rice professors and co-investigators Sylvia Dee and Joseph Campan.

FORECAST will “study how a rapidly changing environment and weather drive the emergence and expansion of deadly pathogens in human populations,” according to a release from Rice.

“This grant supports novel research linking climate change projections to health care solutions while simultaneously ensuring the next generation of scientists, leaders and policymakers have the training to assess and respond to the climate change risks that we already know are increasing every year,” Dee said in the release.

The funding will go toward a variety of new initiatives and centers.

At Rice, the funding will help launch the new Center for Climate and Environmental Health, as well as cross-campus multidisciplinary collaborations, seed grants, postdoctoral and graduate positions, and more, according to the university.

The grant will also support the statewide “Middle to Medical” climate-health educational program for youth. The program will focus on teaching how pathogens spread and how climate change plays a role in the process.

“FORECAST will prepare youth across Texas to make informed health decisions that protect themselves and their families and communities from extreme weather and disease-related risks,” Nancy Moreno, a professor of education, innovation and technology at Baylor College of Medicine and co-investigator on this grant, added in the release.

Anthony Maresso, professor of molecular virology and microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, will share expertise in viral pathogen sewage detection that was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic; while Eric Boerwinkle, dean of the UT School of Public Health, will share insights from the Texas Wastewater Environmental Biomonitoring Network, which tracks disease-causing viruses and bacteria by testing wastewater weekly at Texas sites.

“Hotter days, bigger storms, new disease threats — Texas’s future demands preparation,” Boerwinkle added in the release. “With support from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the FORECAST team is helping Texas detect threats earlier and respond faster, saving lives and strengthening our economy.”

EV surge could shutter 40 refineries by 2040, Wood Mackenzie report warns

ev outlook

The rise of electric vehicles could spell trouble for Houston’s oil and gas sector, a new report suggests. But the oil and gas industry stands to benefit from potential sluggishness in U.S. adoption of EVs.

If worldwide EV adoption rises as expected, global oil demand could fall by five million barrels per day by 2040, accelerating the closure of about 40 oil refineries, says the report, published by energy research and consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. The firm’s North American hub is in Houston.

Those closures might spell trouble for refinery operators with a sizable Houston-area presence, including BP, ExxonMobil, Marathon, Saudi Aramco, and Valero. In 2025, the five companies collectively earned roughly $33 billion from downstream operations, including refineries. One caveat: Each company assigns a different definition to “downstream.”

Refineries in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, including the U.S. but excluding Middle Eastern heavyweights, “are most at risk due to their high energy costs and carbon prices,” the Wood Mackenzie report says.

On the flip side, an abundant U.S. oil supply means American drivers have less of an incentive to switch from traditional cars to electric vehicles, despite stubbornly high fuel prices, according to the report.

Wood Mackenzie predicts EVs will account for 20 percent of the U.S. personal and commercial vehicle fleet in 2040, up from three percent in 2025. That compares with a global forecast of 25 percent in 2040, up from 4 percent last year.

Another U.S. roadblock to EV adoption cited in the report: the country’s relative lack of advanced battery manufacturing.

“Without advanced battery technologies, the U.S. auto sector is at risk of ceding its home market to non-Chinese EVs and falling behind competitors internationally,” the report says.

Furthermore, according to the report, Chinese investment in EV manufacturing in the U.S. probably will remain a no-go and tariffs on Chinese EV imports likely won’t be lifted, even if Democrats resurrected EV incentives following a White House win in 2028.

“Competition among EV manufacturers in international markets will only intensify,” the report notes. “Companies that can offer competitive products in high-growth markets will be best positioned for long-term success.”

View All Listings