coming in hot

Japanese agency invests $36M into Houston e-fuels company's portfolio

In total, HIF has raised $200 million this year. Photo via hifglobal.com

Houston-based electrofuel company HIF Global has secured a $36 million investment from the Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security, a government agency.

The investment, made through an e-fuel subsidiary of Japanese energy company Idemitsu Kosan, is earmarked for HIF’s e-fuel projects in the U.S., Australia, Chile, and Uruguay.

Earlier this year, Idemitsu led a $164 million investment round in HIF. Of that amount, Idemitsu chipped in $114 million. Other investors included Houston-based Baker Hughes along with AME, EIG, Gemstone Investments, and Porsche.

In total, HIF has raised $200 million this year.

“Japan set a priority for the commercial introduction of e-fuels into its fuel supply to support their mandate for 46 percent [greenhouse gas] emissions reduction by 2030. We have already proven e-fuels are a real solution with over 18 months of e-fuels production from our Haru Oni facility in southern Chile,” says Cesar Norton, president and CEO of HIF.

In 2023, Idemitsu agreed to buy e-methanol from HIF’s $6 billion plant in Matagorda County. HIF says the plant will be the world’s first large-scale e-fuel facility. The plant is expected to produce about 1.4 million metric tons per year of e-methanol and about 300,000 metric tons of green hydrogen per year by 2027.

HIF, founded in 2016, aims to produce 150,000 barrels per day of e-fuel and recycle 25 million metric tons per year of carbon dioxide by 2035. E-fuels, which are synthetic alternatives to fossil fuels, include e-gasoline, e-diesel, and e-sustainable aviation fuel converted from e-methanol.

Using electrolyzers powered by renewable energy, HIF begins the e-fuel process by separating hydrogen from oxygen in water. The company then couples the resulting green hydrogen with recycled carbon dioxide to create carbon-neutral e-fuels.

Trending News

A View From HETI

Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder who sued to block the pay package contended that shareholders who had voted for the 10-year plan in 2018 had been given misleading and incomplete information. Photo via cdn.britannica.com

For a second time, a Delaware judge has nullified a pay package that Tesla had awarded its CEO, Elon Musk, that once was valued at $56 billion.

Last week, Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick turned aside a request from Musk's lawyers to reverse a ruling she announced in January that had thrown out the compensation plan. The judge ruled then that Musk effectively controlled Tesla's board and had engineered the outsize pay package during sham negotiations.

Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder who sued to block the pay package contended that shareholders who had voted for the 10-year plan in 2018 had been given misleading and incomplete information.

In their defense, Tesla's board members asserted that the shareholders who ratified the pay plan a second time in June had done so after receiving full disclosures, thereby curing all the problems the judge had cited in her January ruling. As a result, they argued, Musk deserved the pay package for having raised Tesla's market value by billions of dollars.

McCormick rejected that argument. In her 103-page opinion, she ruled that under Delaware law, Tesla's lawyers had no grounds to reverse her January ruling “based on evidence they created after trial.”

What will Musk and Tesla do now?

On Monday night, Tesla posted on X, the social media platform owned by Musk, that the company will appeal. The appeal would be filed with the Delaware Supreme Court, the only state appellate court Tesla can pursue. Experts say a ruling would likely come in less than a year.

“The ruling, if not overturned, means that judges and plaintiffs' lawyers run Delaware companies rather than their rightful owners — the shareholders,” Tesla argued.

Later, on X, Musk unleashed a blistering attack on the judge, asserting that McCormick is “a radical far left activist cosplaying as a judge.”

What do experts say about the case?

Legal authorities generally suggest that McCormick’s ruling was sound and followed the law. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, said that in his view, McCormick was right to rule that after Tesla lost its case in the original trial, it created improper new evidence by asking shareholders to ratify the pay package a second time.

Had she allowed such a claim, he said, it would cause a major shift in Delaware’s laws against conflicts of interest given the unusually close relationship between Musk and Tesla’s board.

“Delaware protects investors — that’s what she did,” said Elson, who has followed the court for more than three decades. “Just because you’re a ‘superstar CEO’ doesn’t put you in a separate category.”

Elson said he thinks investors would be reluctant to put money into Delaware companies if there were exceptions to the law for “special people.”

What will the Delaware Supreme Court do?

Elson said that in his opinion, the court is likely to uphold McCormick's ruling.

Can Tesla appeal to federal courts?

Experts say no. Rulings on state laws are normally left to state courts. Brian Dunn, program director for the Institute of Compensation Studies at Cornell University, said it's been his experience that Tesla has no choice but to stay in the Delaware courts for this compensation package.

Tesla has moved its legal headquarters to Texas. Does that matter?

The company could try to reconstitute the pay package and seek approval in Texas, where it may expect more friendlier judges. But Dunn, who has spent 40 years as an executive compensation consultant, said it's likely that some other shareholder would challenge the award in Texas because it's excessive compared with other CEOs' pay plans.

“If they just want to turn around and deliver him $56 billion, I can't believe somebody wouldn't want to litigate it,” Dunn said. “It's an unconscionable amount of money.”

Would a new pay package be even larger?

Almost certainly. Tesla stock is trading at 15 times the exercise price of stock options in the current package in Delaware, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to investors. Tesla's share price has doubled in the past six months, Jonas wrote. At Monday’s closing stock price, the Musk package is now worth $101.4 billion, according to Equilar, an executive data firm.

And Musk has asked for a subsequent pay package that would give him 25 percent of Tesla's voting shares. Musk has said he is uncomfortable moving further into artificial intelligence with the company if he doesn't have 25 percent control. He currently holds about 13 percent of Tesla's outstanding shares.

Trending News