Now Enrolling

Rice's new program helps managers navigate the complexities of energy transition

Photo courtesy of Rice University

As the planet's temperature continues to rise and extreme weather becomes the new norm, companies are under pressure to make the transition to renewable energy.

But where to start? Rice University's Jones Graduate School of Business is offering a new comprehensive program that delves into the multifaceted challenges posed by the shift toward sustainable energy.

"When it comes to the ever-evolving energy sector most people are paying attention to the tech, but businesses are faced with new organizational challenges," says Professor Yan Anthea Zhang, who will be leading the two-day program March 17-18, 2025. "Senior leaders and managers are constantly being presented with uncertainties about how to move their businesses forward, but if you wait too long, the opportunity disappears."

Energy Transition for Business Leaders participants will engage in interactive workshops, analyze case studies, and network with peers to enhance their understanding of necessary changes in organizational structure, processes, and culture. Key takeaways will include:

  • A comprehensive understanding of stakeholder demands and how to address them
  • Strategies for identifying and implementing necessary strategic changes for energy transition
  • Insights into managing organizational challenges, from resource allocation to cultural shifts
  • Tools for aligning employee incentives with the firm's strategic goals in energy transition

Wondering if you or your employees qualify? Here's who the program is designed for:

  • Senior executives and leaders involved in strategic planning and implementation
  • Sustainability officers seeking to align their organizations with future energy demands
  • HR professionals and talent managers looking to develop a workforce capable of navigating energy transition

Prof. Zhang has has explored these themes and ideas multiple times through the Jones School's MBA program, but not everyone has the time commitment for a two-year degree — or they already have one.

"Nobody has a crystal ball," says Prof. Zhang. "You need to understand your stakeholders' needs, examine your current resources and capabilities, and then make short and long-term plans to move in the direction that's best for your company. That's what participants will learn during this program."

Registration is now open for the spring dates. See more of the program's schedule and fill out an interest form on the program's website here.

Trending News

A View From HETI

Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder who sued to block the pay package contended that shareholders who had voted for the 10-year plan in 2018 had been given misleading and incomplete information. Photo via cdn.britannica.com

For a second time, a Delaware judge has nullified a pay package that Tesla had awarded its CEO, Elon Musk, that once was valued at $56 billion.

Last week, Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick turned aside a request from Musk's lawyers to reverse a ruling she announced in January that had thrown out the compensation plan. The judge ruled then that Musk effectively controlled Tesla's board and had engineered the outsize pay package during sham negotiations.

Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder who sued to block the pay package contended that shareholders who had voted for the 10-year plan in 2018 had been given misleading and incomplete information.

In their defense, Tesla's board members asserted that the shareholders who ratified the pay plan a second time in June had done so after receiving full disclosures, thereby curing all the problems the judge had cited in her January ruling. As a result, they argued, Musk deserved the pay package for having raised Tesla's market value by billions of dollars.

McCormick rejected that argument. In her 103-page opinion, she ruled that under Delaware law, Tesla's lawyers had no grounds to reverse her January ruling “based on evidence they created after trial.”

What will Musk and Tesla do now?

On Monday night, Tesla posted on X, the social media platform owned by Musk, that the company will appeal. The appeal would be filed with the Delaware Supreme Court, the only state appellate court Tesla can pursue. Experts say a ruling would likely come in less than a year.

“The ruling, if not overturned, means that judges and plaintiffs' lawyers run Delaware companies rather than their rightful owners — the shareholders,” Tesla argued.

Later, on X, Musk unleashed a blistering attack on the judge, asserting that McCormick is “a radical far left activist cosplaying as a judge.”

What do experts say about the case?

Legal authorities generally suggest that McCormick’s ruling was sound and followed the law. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, said that in his view, McCormick was right to rule that after Tesla lost its case in the original trial, it created improper new evidence by asking shareholders to ratify the pay package a second time.

Had she allowed such a claim, he said, it would cause a major shift in Delaware’s laws against conflicts of interest given the unusually close relationship between Musk and Tesla’s board.

“Delaware protects investors — that’s what she did,” said Elson, who has followed the court for more than three decades. “Just because you’re a ‘superstar CEO’ doesn’t put you in a separate category.”

Elson said he thinks investors would be reluctant to put money into Delaware companies if there were exceptions to the law for “special people.”

What will the Delaware Supreme Court do?

Elson said that in his opinion, the court is likely to uphold McCormick's ruling.

Can Tesla appeal to federal courts?

Experts say no. Rulings on state laws are normally left to state courts. Brian Dunn, program director for the Institute of Compensation Studies at Cornell University, said it's been his experience that Tesla has no choice but to stay in the Delaware courts for this compensation package.

Tesla has moved its legal headquarters to Texas. Does that matter?

The company could try to reconstitute the pay package and seek approval in Texas, where it may expect more friendlier judges. But Dunn, who has spent 40 years as an executive compensation consultant, said it's likely that some other shareholder would challenge the award in Texas because it's excessive compared with other CEOs' pay plans.

“If they just want to turn around and deliver him $56 billion, I can't believe somebody wouldn't want to litigate it,” Dunn said. “It's an unconscionable amount of money.”

Would a new pay package be even larger?

Almost certainly. Tesla stock is trading at 15 times the exercise price of stock options in the current package in Delaware, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to investors. Tesla's share price has doubled in the past six months, Jonas wrote. At Monday’s closing stock price, the Musk package is now worth $101.4 billion, according to Equilar, an executive data firm.

And Musk has asked for a subsequent pay package that would give him 25 percent of Tesla's voting shares. Musk has said he is uncomfortable moving further into artificial intelligence with the company if he doesn't have 25 percent control. He currently holds about 13 percent of Tesla's outstanding shares.

Trending News